Z.EntityFramework.Extensions.EFCore v9.103.6.4 doesn't support inMemory BulkInsert

[dean-kaila]

Description

After upgrading to the following

• dotnet9
• Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.InMemory:9.0.0
• Z.EntityFramework.Extensions.EFCore:9.103.6.4

BulkInsert doesn't work with the inmemory provider. This used to work on the following.

• dotnet8
• Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.InMemory:8.0.10
• Z.EntityFramework.Extensions.EFCore:8.103.6

One of my unit tests is calling a service which uses bulkInsert and now is failing with the exception below.
To replicate, I just followed this example (https://entityframework-extensions.net/efcore-inmemory-provider) using the latest packages as listed above but using the BulkInsert instead.
If this isn't supported anymore, please advise on how to resolve.

Exception

System.InvalidOperationException: The model must be finalized and its runtime dependencies must be initialized before 'GetRelationalModel' can be used. Ensure that either 'OnModelCreating' has completed or, if using a stand-alone 'ModelBuilder', that 'IModelRuntimeInitializer.Initialize(model.FinalizeModel())' was called.
   at Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.RelationalModelExtensions.GetRelationalModel(IModel model)
   at Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Internal.RelationalModelExtensions.EnsureRelationalModel(IModel model)
   at Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.RelationalTypeBaseExtensions.GetTableMappings(ITypeBase typeBase)
   at Z.EntityFramework.Extensions.EntityTypeZInfo.CleanupEntityConstructor()
   at Z.EntityFramework.Extensions.EntityTypeZInfo..ctor(IEntityType entityType)
   at PublicExtensions..(IEntityType )
   at System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary`2.GetOrAdd(TKey key, Func`2 valueFactory)
   at PublicExtensions.ToZInfo(IEntityType entityType)
   at .BulkInsert[T](DbContext this, IEnumerable`1 entities, Action`1 options, Boolean isBulkSaveChanges, Boolean isOptimized)

Fiddle or Project (Optional)

https://dotnetfiddle.net/NCoIGU

[JonathanMagnan]

Hello @dean-kaila ,

Thank you for reporting, indeed there is some scenario we do not support yet for InMemory.

We are currently looking into it.

Best Regards,

Jon