ctsm5.3.021: Standardize time metadata (we will mark this as the release tag for ctsm5.3) #2052
+223
−32
Task list completed / task-list-completed
Started
2025-01-23 01:26:18
ago
7 / 17 tasks completed
10 tasks still to be completed
Details
Required Tasks
| Task | Status |
|---|---|
| This diff from the baseline comes from comparing the .rest files, and the restart comparison failed in the baseline. The test does not differ from the baseline when comparing the .base files. So the issue to resolve is not this failure but the restart comparison in the baseline. | Incomplete |
| Also the restart comparison passed here, so the restart comparison failure in the baseline may not be critical to solve, as there is no sign of anything else being affected. | Incomplete |
| Make the same or equivalent change as eeedbc6 to the corresponding rtm/mosart files. | Completed |
| Bring Erik's bug-fix from ESCOMP/MOSART#112 also to rtm. | Completed |
| Resolve mosart/cpl BASELINE DIFFs discussed initially here | |
| by replacing the if-statement in commit 692d183 with a comment, as explained in ESCOMP/MOSART#103 (comment). | Completed |
| All of the above will be done in the mosart1.1.08 and rtm1_0_85 tags | Completed |
| Take this opportunity to update cime6.1.49 to cime6.1.56 to avoid the rpointercpl bug? Should be fixed with b4b-dev on 1/16. | Completed |
| Erik: Bring in the whatsnew in ctsm5.3 PR on b4b-dev | Completed |
| Make sure b4b-dev is brought in by this point, currently planned as ctsm5.3.020 | Completed |
| Finalize the What'sNew in CTSM5.3 document listed below. | Incomplete |
| Update WhatsNew as per this document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/12KS5eU6gIaicZ4hJhgZWmys8fLLl5IkxwC_Pi76FuHw/edit?tab=t.0 | Incomplete |
| Do things in: https://github.com/ESCOMP/CTSM/wiki/Minor-Version-Update-Protocols | Incomplete |
| Do some testing for mksurfdata_esmf to make sure it's still working and will be ready for ctsm5.4 when the CMIP7 datasets come down. | Incomplete |
| Decide who should review what part of changes from the ctsm5.3.0 tag | Incomplete |
| Would it make sense for us to include the one-line ccs_config update to enable f09_t232? | Incomplete |
| Is it complicated to make a new ccs_config tag? I doubt that I have permission. | Incomplete |
| Or is there a way around making a new ccs_config tag? | Incomplete |
| Or should we wait for the fix to come in later? | Incomplete |
| FAIL ERS_D_Ld30.f45_f45_mg37.I2000Clm50FatesCruRsGs.izumi_nag.clm-FatesColdPRT2 CREATE_NEWCASE | |
Submitted again but with ./create_test and ran out of wallclock, so resubmitted and ran out of wallclock again, so tried ./create_test ... --wallclock 04:00:00 and ran out of wallclock a third time, so now increase the test's wallclock in testlist_clm.xml BUT FAILED AGAIN. The email notification always says that walltime was 1 hour. |
Incomplete |
| "time" is now the middle of "time_bounds" | Incomplete |
| the elimination of the 0th time step | Incomplete |
| Update to ccs_config_cesm1.0.20 and rerun testing on derecho, comparing against the baselines that I generated last. | Incomplete |
| Test mksurfdata_esmf | Incomplete |
| Replicate NCAR/LMWG_dev#70 (or 69 or 68) using this new release tag and make sure I get the same namelists, though expect answers to change due to dust | Incomplete |
| ADD INFO ABOUT the HISTORY CHANGES | Incomplete |
| ADD PR links to "soil mksurfdata_esmf bug" and other paragraphs | Incomplete |
Loading