Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(metric-engine): introduce index options from metric engine #5374

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

WenyXu
Copy link
Member

@WenyXu WenyXu commented Jan 15, 2025

I hereby agree to the terms of the GreptimeDB CLA.

Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)

#5282

What's changed and what's your intention?

This PR introduces index options to the metric engine, addressing scenarios with high cardinality where inverted index files can grow excessively large. By allowing users to specify index types and parameters, such as skipping indexes with customizable granularity, users can better control index behavior and optimize storage.

For example:
In this case, all auto-added columns will apply the index options specified by the user.

CREATE TABLE phy (
    ts TIMESTAMP TIME INDEX, 
    val DOUBLE
) ENGINE=metric WITH (
    "physical_metric_table" = "", 
    "index.type" = "skipping", 
    "index.granularity" = "8192"
);

If a logical table is created on the physical table:

CREATE TABLE t1 (
    ts TIMESTAMP TIME INDEX, 
    val DOUBLE, 
    host STRING PRIMARY KEY
) ENGINE=metric WITH (
    "on_physical_table" = "phy"
);

The resulting physical table will have the following schema:

+-------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Table | Create Table                                                                    |
+-------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| phy   | CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS "phy" (                                              |
|       |   "ts" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL,                                                   |
|       |   "val" DOUBLE NULL,                                                            |
|       |   "host" STRING NULL SKIPPING INDEX WITH(granularity = '8192', type = 'BLOOM'), |
|       |   TIME INDEX ("ts"),                                                            |
|       |   PRIMARY KEY ("host"),                                                         |
|       | )                                                                               |
|       |                                                                                 |
|       | ENGINE=metric                                                                   |
|       | WITH(                                                                           |
|       |   'index.granularity' = '8192',                                                 |
|       |   'index.type' = 'skipping',                                                    |
|       |   physical_metric_table = ''                                                    |
|       | )                                                                               |
+-------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

PR Checklist

Please convert it to a draft if some of the following conditions are not met.

  • I have written the necessary rustdoc comments.
  • I have added the necessary unit tests and integration tests.
  • This PR requires documentation updates.
  • API changes are backward compatible.
  • Schema or data changes are backward compatible.

@WenyXu WenyXu requested review from waynexia, v0y4g3r and a team as code owners January 15, 2025 15:27
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added docs-not-required This change does not impact docs. docs-required This change requires docs update. and removed docs-not-required This change does not impact docs. labels Jan 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added docs-not-required This change does not impact docs. and removed docs-required This change requires docs update. labels Jan 15, 2025
@WenyXu WenyXu requested a review from fengjiachun January 15, 2025 15:36
@WenyXu WenyXu force-pushed the feat/metric-table-index-options branch from c26eb4a to f8e301a Compare January 15, 2025 15:56
@WenyXu WenyXu requested a review from evenyag as a code owner January 15, 2025 16:14
@WenyXu WenyXu force-pushed the feat/metric-table-index-options branch from 3f1c718 to edea1c6 Compare January 16, 2025 08:41
@@ -71,6 +71,27 @@ DESC TABLE phy;
| job | String | PRI | YES | | TAG |
+------------+----------------------+-----+------+---------+---------------+

SHOW CREATE TABLE phy;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why can’t see the __table_id and __tsid columns?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The __table_id and __tsid are internal columns, and these columns and column options will be generated via the metric engine.

@@ -529,7 +542,8 @@ impl MetricEngineInner {
DATA_SCHEMA_TSID_COLUMN_NAME,
ConcreteDataType::uint64_datatype(),
false,
),
)
.with_inverted_index(false),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's clean up

options.insert(
"index.inverted_index.ignore_column_ids".to_string(),
IGNORE_COLUMN_IDS_FOR_DATA_REGION.iter().join(","),
);

@@ -142,6 +148,19 @@ impl DataRegion {

c.column_id = new_column_id_start + delta as u32;
c.column_schema.set_nullable();
match index_options {
IndexOptions::Inverted => {
c.column_schema.set_inverted_index(true);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is an incompatible change. Once the schema of a certain column is explicitly set to have an inverted key, the condition for indexing the tag by default will be destroyed.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes... it's ok for the newly created table. But it's problematic to alter these options.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs-not-required This change does not impact docs.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants