Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update docker-compose.yaml #233

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update docker-compose.yaml #233

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion docker-compose.yaml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ version: '3.9'

services:
web:
image: trainwithshubham/node-app:latest
build:
context: .
Comment on lines +5 to +6
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Consider adding version control for reproducible builds.

While using local builds provides flexibility, consider adding a version tag to ensure reproducible builds across environments:

 services:
   web:
     build:
       context: .
+      dockerfile: Dockerfile
+      args:
+        NODE_VERSION: 16-alpine

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

💡 Codebase verification

Local build configuration is valid but needs improvements

The switch to local build context is supported by a valid Dockerfile, however there are some concerns:

  • The Dockerfile uses an outdated Node.js version (12.2.0) which is no longer supported
  • Running tests during image build (RUN npm run test) may not be a best practice
  • No .dockerignore file was found which could lead to unnecessary files in build context

Recommendations:

  • Update Node.js base image to an LTS version (e.g., node:20-alpine)
  • Consider moving test execution to CI pipeline instead of Dockerfile
  • Add a .dockerignore file to exclude node_modules, test files, and other unnecessary content
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify Dockerfile existence and build configuration.

The change from a pre-built image to local build requires a valid Dockerfile in the root directory.

Let me try another approach to verify the Dockerfile and CI configuration.

Let me check the content of the Dockerfile since we confirmed its existence.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if Dockerfile exists and validate its content
if [ -f "Dockerfile" ]; then
    echo "Dockerfile found. Checking content..."
    cat Dockerfile
else
    echo "Error: Dockerfile not found in the root directory"
    exit 1
fi

Length of output: 401

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Dockerfile in the repository
echo "Searching for Dockerfile..."
fd Dockerfile

# Check for CI configuration files in specific locations
echo -e "\nSearching for CI config files..."
fd -t f "^\.gitlab-ci\.yml$|^config\.yml$|^.*\.ya?ml$" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 354

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Display Dockerfile contents
echo "Checking Dockerfile contents:"
cat Dockerfile

# List all yaml/yml files recursively to find CI configs
echo -e "\nSearching for CI config files in repository:"
fd -e yml -e yaml

Length of output: 734

ports:
- "8000:8000"