Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update docker-compose.yaml #264

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update docker-compose.yaml #264

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
0147536
Update docker-compose.yaml
Dipanwita99 Jan 2, 2025
b9327a2
Update Jenkinsfile
Dipanwita99 Jan 2, 2025
a497585
Update Jenkinsfile
Dipanwita99 Jan 2, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docker-compose.yaml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,6 +2,6 @@ version: '3.9'

services:
web:
image: trainwithshubham/node-app:latest
image: 12082014/node-app:latest
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

💡 Codebase verification

Switch to a verified and well-maintained image source

Based on the Docker Hub API results, there are several concerns with the new image:

  1. The repository was just created today (date_registered: 2025-01-02) and has very low usage (pull_count: 8)
  2. It's maintained by an individual account with a numeric username
  3. The image lacks description, stars, and proper documentation
  4. The previous image (trainwithshubham/node-app) shows consistent maintenance and higher usage

Recommendations:

  • Revert to using the previous trainwithshubham/node-app image or provide documentation about:
    • The relationship between the two repositories
    • The build process and security measures for the new image
    • Reasons for switching to a personal repository
  • Consider using specific version tags instead of latest for both stability and security tracking
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the new image source and consider version pinning

The change switches the image source to what appears to be a personal Docker Hub repository. This raises some concerns:

  1. Please verify and document:

    • The ownership and maintenance of the new image repository
    • The build process and security practices
    • The relationship between the old and new repositories

  2. Consider using a specific version tag instead of latest to ensure deployment consistency and avoid unexpected updates.

Let's verify the image details:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check image details and compare with the previous image

# Check new image details
echo "New image details:"
curl -s "https://hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/12082014/node-app/tags/"

# Check previous image details for comparison
echo -e "\nPrevious image details:"
curl -s "https://hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/trainwithshubham/node-app/tags/"

# Check pull statistics and last updated
echo -e "\nRepository details:"
curl -s "https://hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/12082014/node-app/"

Length of output: 2796

ports:
- "8000:8000"