Skip to content
MetaCoq CI

Primitive evaluation #2556

Sign in to view logs

Primitive evaluation

Primitive evaluation #2556

Triggered via pull request December 4, 2023 15:10
@mattam82mattam82
synchronize #1027
primitive-arrays-eval
Status Success
Total duration 30m 27s
Artifacts –

build.yml

on: pull_request
checktodos
3s
checktodos
Matrix: build
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

20 warnings
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
The default and global localities for this command outside sections
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ ,,, _" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
The default and global localities for this command outside sections
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ ,,, _" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
The following logical axioms were