Skip to content

Prove that dearging preserves eta-expanded constructors and fixpoints… #2565

Prove that dearging preserves eta-expanded constructors and fixpoints…

Prove that dearging preserves eta-expanded constructors and fixpoints… #2565

Triggered via push December 12, 2023 16:47
Status Failure
Total duration 25m 46s
Artifacts

build.yml

on: push
checktodos
8s
checktodos
Matrix: build
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

5 errors and 20 warnings
checktodos
Process completed with exit code 1.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Unable to apply lemma of type "forall x y : ?A, x == y -> x = y"
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
The job was canceled because "_8_17_4_14-flambda_opam" failed.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Unable to apply lemma of type "forall x y : ?A, x == y -> x = y"
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
The operation was canceled.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
The default and global localities for this command outside sections
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ ,,, _" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Use of “Require” inside a section is fragile. It is not recommended
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
The default and global localities for this command outside sections
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ ,,, _" was already used.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.17, 4.14-flambda, local)
Use of “Require” inside a section is fragile. It is not recommended