[Backport release-24.05] linuxPackages.openafs: Patch for Linux kernel 6.12

[andersk]

Backport to release-24.05:

• linuxPackages.openafs: Patch for Linux kernel 6.12 #358842
  Apply the upstream patches from https://gerrit.openafs.org/#/q/project:openafs+branch:openafs-stable-1_8_x+topic:linux-6.12 to fix building for Linux kernel 6.12.

References:

• This was necessitated by the backport of kernel 6.12 to 24.05 in [24.05] Backport latest kernel updates #356944
• These same patches were backported to release-24.11 in [Backport release-24.11] linuxPackages.openafs: Patch for Linux kernel 6.12 #359929.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[wolfgangwalther]

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 361600

---

x86_64-linux

⏩ 32 packages marked as broken and skipped:

• linuxKernel.packages.linux_4_19_hardened.openafs
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_4_19_hardened.openafs_1_8
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_10_hardened.openafs
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_10_hardened.openafs_1_8
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_15_hardened.openafs
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_15_hardened.openafs_1_8
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_4_hardened.openafs
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_4_hardened.openafs_1_8
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_11_hardened.openafs
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_11_hardened.openafs_1_8
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_1_hardened.openafs
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_1_hardened.openafs_1_8
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_6_hardened.openafs
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_6_hardened.openafs_1_8
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_hardened.openafs
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_hardened.openafs_1_8
• linuxPackages_4_19_hardened.openafs
• linuxPackages_4_19_hardened.openafs_1_8
• linuxPackages_5_10_hardened.openafs
• linuxPackages_5_10_hardened.openafs_1_8
• linuxPackages_5_15_hardened.openafs
• linuxPackages_5_15_hardened.openafs_1_8
• linuxPackages_5_4_hardened.openafs
• linuxPackages_5_4_hardened.openafs_1_8
• linuxPackages_6_11_hardened.openafs
• linuxPackages_6_11_hardened.openafs_1_8
• linuxPackages_6_1_hardened.openafs
• linuxPackages_6_1_hardened.openafs_1_8
• linuxPackages_6_6_hardened.openafs
• linuxPackages_6_6_hardened.openafs_1_8
• linuxPackages_hardened.openafs
• linuxPackages_hardened.openafs_1_8

❌ 1 package failed to build:

• linuxPackages_latest-libre.openafs (linuxKernel.packages.linux_latest_libre.openafs ,linuxPackages_latest-libre.openafs_1_8)

✅ 13 packages built:

• linuxKernel.packages.linux_4_19.openafs (linuxKernel.packages.linux_4_19.openafs_1_8)
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_10.openafs (linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_10.openafs_1_8)
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_15.openafs (linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_15.openafs_1_8)
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_4.openafs (linuxKernel.packages.linux_5_4.openafs_1_8)
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_1.openafs (linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_1.openafs_1_8)
• linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_11.openafs (linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_11.openafs_1_8)
• linuxPackages_latest.openafs (linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_12.openafs ,linuxPackages_latest.openafs_1_8)
• linuxPackages.openafs (linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_6.openafs ,linuxPackages.openafs_1_8)
• linuxPackages-libre.openafs (linuxKernel.packages.linux_libre.openafs ,linuxPackages-libre.openafs_1_8)
• linuxPackages_lqx.openafs (linuxKernel.packages.linux_lqx.openafs ,linuxPackages_lqx.openafs_1_8)
• linuxPackages_xanmod.openafs (linuxKernel.packages.linux_xanmod.openafs ,linuxPackages_xanmod.openafs_1_8)
• linuxPackages_xanmod_latest.openafs (linuxKernel.packages.linux_xanmod_latest.openafs ,linuxPackages_xanmod_latest.openafs_1_8 ,linuxPackages_xanmod_stable.openafs ,linuxPackages_xanmod_stable.openafs_1_8)
• linuxPackages_zen.openafs (linuxKernel.packages.linux_zen.openafs ,linuxPackages_zen.openafs_1_8)

[wolfgangwalther]

The build failure I get is this:

       > Running phase: buildPhase
       > /nix/store/2xw5iqy16khc2fp0h9mn2q1nnqhx0x9b-stdenv-linux/setup: line 1586: /nix/store/pxic1zyba59whccpw2x87vca6xhz2bpa-branches-r19663/6.12/deblob-6.12: No such file or directory
       For full logs, run 'nix log /nix/store/jp5acbbwky0sh338fdljqp3ygignsb18-linux-6.12.4-libre-src.drv'.

Is this expected?

[andersk]

@wolfgangwalther That’s a failure of linux_latest-libre itself, not linuxPackages_latest-libre.openafs, so it can be ignored for this PR (but probably someone ought to fix it elsewhere).

https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixos/release-24.05/nixpkgs.linux_latest-libre.x86_64-linux
https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixos/release-24.11/nixpkgs.linux_latest-libre.x86_64-linux

• linux_latest-libre: fix build #359464

[andersk]

Opened separate PRs for that:

• [Backport release-24.11] linux_latest-libre: 19663 -> 19675 (#359464) #364053
• [Backport release-24.05] linux_latest-libre: 19663 -> 19675 (#359464) #364054