Update RCM-DX-Specification_EN.md

[Jean-FredericBonjour]

Hi RCM-DX,
I propose to add new consistencytype WARNING & EXCLUDED Please review.
Cheers Jean-Frédéric

[schalbts]

Question about "excluded": The data has been excluded from the consistency check?
How has the data been verified?

And
maybe we can change the wording to make the paragraph more consistent (was/has been)?

Name	Description
CONSISTENT	The referenced data has been checked and is consistent
INCONSISTENT	The referenced data has been checked and is inconsistent
WARNING	The referenced data has been checked and set to warning (undefined: orange)
EXCLUDED	The referenced data has been verified, but is defined as to be exluded from the consistency
NO_DATA	Consistency has been checked, but no data was found

[Jean-FredericBonjour]

Hi Stephanie,
Thanks for checking my change request and for your answer. Of course "was" can be replaced by "has been".

Unfortunately, it's impossible for me to change my own pull request. Either you can reject this current pull request and I will do another one or you do the modification by yourself.

Here below in bold the proposed changes. I changed the definition of EXCLUDED to be more precise

Name	Description
CONSISTENT	The referenced data has been checked and is consistent (OK: green)
INCONSISTENT	The referenced data has been checked and is inconsistent (not OK: red)
WARNING	The referenced data has been checked and set to warning (undefined: orange)
EXCLUDED	The referenced data has been checked for consistency and is defined to be flagged as excluded.
NO_DATA	Consistency has been checked, but no data was found

Cheers Jean-Frédéric