Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow chi_n parameter to vary over the time path #897

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 6, 2024

Conversation

jdebacker
Copy link
Member

This PR updates OG-Core to allow users to specify a $\chi^n_s$ parameter that can vary over the time path (i.e., $\chi^n_{s,t}$).

With this, users can simulate policies that may affect the ability of individuals to work longer at older ages.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 30, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (974eac0) 80.38% compared to head (272c969) 80.52%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #897      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.38%   80.52%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files          19       19              
  Lines        4445     4452       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits         3573     3585      +12     
+ Misses        872      867       -5     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 80.52% <94.44%> (+0.14%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
ogcore/SS.py 87.58% <ø> (ø)
ogcore/TPI.py 93.02% <100.00%> (ø)
ogcore/utils.py 89.92% <100.00%> (+1.56%) ⬆️
ogcore/parameters.py 84.30% <92.85%> (+0.15%) ⬆️

@jdebacker jdebacker marked this pull request as ready for review January 30, 2024 22:22
@rickecon
Copy link
Member

rickecon commented Feb 6, 2024

@jdebacker. This looks great. Merging.

@rickecon rickecon merged commit 42cd461 into PSLmodels:master Feb 6, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants