Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improved spin-free closed-shell biorthogonalization #135

Open
wants to merge 21 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

evaleev
Copy link
Member

@evaleev evaleev commented Aug 13, 2023

Current biorothogonalization using the pseudoinverse of the excitation manifold metric does not reduce the number of terms for CCSDT and higher. The new approach using the metric QR should be an improvement,

@evaleev evaleev force-pushed the evaleev/feature/improved-biorthog branch 2 times, most recently from 623a177 to 0260751 Compare August 14, 2023 19:43
@evaleev evaleev force-pushed the evaleev/feature/improved-biorthog branch from a7c8538 to 37098c8 Compare August 16, 2023 19:24
@evaleev evaleev force-pushed the evaleev/feature/improved-biorthog branch 2 times, most recently from 455eb4f to f935e8e Compare August 16, 2023 22:37
@evaleev evaleev force-pushed the evaleev/feature/improved-biorthog branch from f935e8e to d192f6b Compare August 17, 2023 12:03
…with QR than with PINV, but for CCSDTQ R4 there are no savings wrt PINV
@Krzmbrzl
Copy link
Collaborator

Krzmbrzl commented Aug 25, 2023

The new approach using the metric QR should be an improvement

Is this effectively the approach described in this work or is this a different approach?

The method described in that paper creates a "semi-biorthogonal" basis (in their approach obtained by a least-squares minimization) and then removes a lot of terms by projecting out all residual tensor components within the null-space of the overlap matrix of the configurations generated by the $\hat{E}$ operators (see section III.C and III.D).

@evaleev
Copy link
Member Author

evaleev commented Aug 25, 2023

@Krzmbrzl yes along the lines of Gerald's work, but improved ... the equations published on their group's site are not as compact as they can be

@evaleev
Copy link
Member Author

evaleev commented Aug 25, 2023

@Krzmbrzl if you have better approaches in my mind I'm all ears ... spin-adaptation of CCSDT is not described well in the literature and it seems to generally involve relatively sophisticated representation theory ...

@Krzmbrzl
Copy link
Collaborator

Nah, I don't have better ideas. I was simply looking into the subject and was wondering whether you are implementing an approach that I have not yet heard of.
Maybe we will eventually look into this subject again for our icMRCC equations, but for now I have to get them generated in the first place :D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants