Get rid of --large-indicies
using higher levels
#33
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Agda disables the option
--large-indicies
by default because it can cause inconsistencies (especially with--forced-argument-recursion
, which is enabled by default). Hence, it's better to disable it as well.Unfortunately,
MonadWriter
cannot handle differentLevel
s for the Value and the Result type. Hence, theignore-value
andreturn-value
hack is required to shift theLevel
s as required.There are still some cases in
IndexedSet
where theLevel
s could be generalized even more. I know of at least theTransitive
laws. However, the standard library doesn't provide aTrans
definition allowing different indices as for homogeneous transitivity. We don't need this generality yet, so I just left it out for now.