Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BIP372, BIP381: editorial fixups #1740

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

jonatack
Copy link
Member

@jonatack jonatack commented Jan 6, 2025

Merges and improves on the editorial spelling/grammar suggestions in #1720.

Closes #1720.

@jonatack jonatack merged commit cc67871 into bitcoin:master Jan 6, 2025
4 checks passed
@jonatack jonatack deleted the 2025-01-merge-misc-fixups branch January 6, 2025 16:47
Copy link
Member

@theuni theuni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Considering this isn't just 1:1 spell-check fixes, it was merged a bit too quickly imo :(

LGTM other than the comment. Considering the weight of the words "may", "must", etc, in BIPS, it would be nice to have another set of eyes on changes like this before merging.

of such outputs much allow hardware devices to understand the structure of such
P2C tweaks commit to external data, some of which may represent certain values
(like in some sidechains, single-use-seal applications like RGB, etc). Creation
of such outputs may allow hardware devices to understand the structure of such
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a bit clunky before and after. I suspect "much allow" was supposed to be "must allow", which would be more readable as "would require".

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for taking a look.
@dr-orlovsky what is your intended meaning here?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it was "must allow" typo. "May allow" is more correct. "Would require" has an opposite meaning

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Happy to be wrong, thanks for chiming in!

@jonatack
Copy link
Member Author

jonatack commented Jan 7, 2025

@theuni that's fair, thank you for the feedback, wouldn't have hurt to wait a bit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants