-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improvements to the LST workflows and small general LST fixes #46967
Improvements to the LST workflows and small general LST fixes #46967
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46967/43040
|
A new Pull Request was created by @VourMa for master. It involves the following packages:
@AdrianoDee, @Moanwar, @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @DickyChant, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @miquork, @rseidita, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals
RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ...
GPU Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@smuzaffar |
yes @slava77 , comparison job is not run if there are relval failures.
sure, sounds reasonable. We will update bot to run comparison job for passed relvals |
the question is somewhat academic for this PR though: the workflow numbers in this PR are not present in the baseline and the affected code does not run in other requested workflows. |
For valid additional workflows, bot does try to generate baseline. For this PR it did try to generate baseline for Note, that bot can only generate baselines for workflows if they are available in IB. Any new workflow added by PR will not have any baseline |
Yes, that's what I implied in my "academic" comment Actually, only one workflow is not defined in the baseline ( |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
GPU Comparison SummarySummary:
|
FractionOfCandOverSeeds_highPtTripletStepTrackCandidates_highPtTripletStep changed in 29634.703 I guess it's from https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/pull/46967/files#diff-a67b503ef4abafb8f3149bdb2412b9e125b2b0de50f969d52c5400e8267823aaR398-R402 |
Yes |
(after 2 days of no indication of review) |
+1 |
+Upgrade |
+pdmv |
+dqm
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @mandrenguyen, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
This PR follows up on some items from #46746. More specifically, I have:
0.704
run on a GPU only if there is one, otherwise fall back to CPU (hardware-agnostic workflow, in accordance with the rest of heterogeneous workflows in CMSSW).std::lower_bound
.SeedStopInfo
size mismatch between theTrackCandidate
and theTrajectorySeed
collections.MessageLogger
instead ofprintf
, renamings, etc.)I have tested the changes privately and the performance is exactly the same, so this is a technical PR.