Feat/migrate to pnpn #1188
Feat/migrate to pnpn #1188
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes across multiple files to transition the project from using npm to pnpm as the package manager. The Dockerfile has been updated to install pnpm and modify dependency installation commands accordingly. Documentation files, including README.md and E2E Overview.md, reflect these changes by updating commands and adding new environment variables for end-to-end testing. The setup.sh script has also been modified to use pnpm commands. Overall, the changes aim to streamline dependency management and enhance the clarity of setup instructions. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
E2E Overview.md (1)
Line range hint 39-45: Enhance documentation clarity for environment variables.
The documentation could be more helpful by:
- Specifying where these hardcoded values can be found (e.g., in which file)
- Explaining why these values need to be unique
- Providing example values or a reference to a sample configuration
Consider adding this clarification:
These values are currently hardcoded and should be unique for each user.
+You can find these hardcoded values in `drizzle/seedE2E.ts`. Ensure these values match
+the ones generated during the database seeding process.setup.sh (2)
23-23: Improve command formatting for better usability.
While the migration to pnpm is correct, the command format might cause confusion. Commands separated by commas won't execute properly when copied directly.
Consider updating the format:
-echo "- Terminal 2) - pnpm db:migrate, pnpm db:seed, pnpm dev "
+echo "- Terminal 2) Run these commands:"
+echo " pnpm db:migrate"
+echo " pnpm db:seed"
+echo " pnpm dev"Line range hint 1-23: Add pnpm installation verification.
Since the setup now depends on pnpm, it would be helpful to verify its installation and provide guidance if it's missing.
Add this check at the beginning of the script:
#!/bin/bash
+# Check if pnpm is installed
+if ! command -v pnpm &> /dev/null; then
+ echo "Error: pnpm is not installed"
+ echo "Install it using: npm install -g pnpm"
+ exit 1
+fi
+
echo "#################################################"README.md (2)
27-27: Add pnpm installation instructions.
Since we're migrating to pnpm, we should add instructions for installing pnpm itself before the pnpm install step. This will help new contributors get started smoothly.
Add the following before the install command:
4. Install dependencies with:
+First, install pnpm if you haven't already:
+```bash
+npm install -g pnpm
+```
+
+Then install project dependencies:
```bash
pnpm install
---
Line range hint `1-1`: **Fix PR title typo: "pnpn" should be "pnpm".**
The PR title mentions "pnpn" but the changes correctly implement "pnpm". Consider updating the PR title to avoid confusion.
<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>
<details>
<summary>🪛 LanguageTool</summary>
[style] ~30-~30: Consider an alternative verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...th: ```bash pnpm install ``` - If you have any issues installing dependencies, che...
(IF_YOU_HAVE_THIS_PROBLEM)
</details>
</details>
</details>
</details>
<details>
<summary>📜 Review details</summary>
**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**
**Review profile: CHILL**
<details>
<summary>📥 Commits</summary>
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60267e5029932ce0016f1d8a64e6896bf3e1e916 and a8c218fb72ca74d41ebdc143072abb83fde92cc7.
</details>
<details>
<summary>⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)</summary>
* `.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yml` is excluded by `!**/*.yml`
* `.github/workflows/pull-request.yml` is excluded by `!**/*.yml`
* `package-lock.json` is excluded by `!**/package-lock.json`, `!**/*.json`
* `package.json` is excluded by `!**/*.json`
* `pnpm-lock.yaml` is excluded by `!**/pnpm-lock.yaml`, `!**/*.yaml`
</details>
<details>
<summary>📒 Files selected for processing (5)</summary>
* Dockerfile (2 hunks)
* E2E Overview.md (1 hunks)
* README.md (2 hunks)
* playwright.config.ts (1 hunks)
* setup.sh (1 hunks)
</details>
<details>
<summary>🔇 Additional comments (6)</summary>
<details>
<summary>E2E Overview.md (1)</summary>
`20-20`: **Verify consistency of package manager commands.**
While the database seeding command has been updated to use `pnpm`, the test execution commands still use `npx`. Consider updating these for consistency with the pnpm migration.
Consider updating the test commands to:
```diff
-npx playwright test
+pnpm playwright test
-npx playwright test --ui
+pnpm playwright test --ui
Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint 12-32: Verify CI/CD pipeline compatibility
The migration to pnpm might affect CI/CD workflows and build processes. Ensure that all build environments and deployment pipelines are updated accordingly.
Let's check for any remaining npm references in CI configuration:
✅ Verification successful
CI/CD pipeline is already compatible with pnpm
The CI/CD pipeline is already fully configured for pnpm:
- All GitHub Actions workflows use
pnpm/action-setup@v4for installation - Node.js setup uses
cache: "pnpm"configuration - All package installation commands use
pnpm install - Package.json scripts are package-manager agnostic
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for npm commands in GitHub Actions workflows and other CI configs
# that might need updating for pnpm compatibility
echo "Checking CI/CD configurations for npm commands..."
rg -g '*.{yml,yaml}' 'npm (ci|install|run|build)' .github/
rg -g '*.{yml,yaml}' 'npm (ci|install|run|build)' .gitlab/
rg -g '*.{yml,yaml}' 'npm (ci|install|run|build)' .circleci/
Length of output: 509
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check all CI/CD related files for any package manager commands to ensure complete verification
echo "Checking all CI/CD configurations..."
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/ -x cat {}
# Also check for any package.json scripts that might need updating
echo -e "\nChecking package.json scripts..."
cat package.json | jq '.scripts'
Length of output: 7120
playwright.config.ts (1)
70-70: LGTM! Command updated for pnpm migration.
The change from npm run dev:e2e to pnpm dev:e2e aligns with the project's migration to pnpm.
Let's verify that this script exists in package.json:
✅ Verification successful
Script exists and matches the expected usage ✓
The dev:e2e script is correctly defined in package.json as "dev:e2e": "ENV=E2E next dev", confirming that the command referenced in the playwright.config.ts will work correctly with pnpm.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the dev:e2e script exists in package.json
# Expected: Should find the script definition in package.json
rg '"dev:e2e":\s*"[^"]*"' package.json
Length of output: 75
README.md (3)
51-51: LGTM!
The database migration command has been correctly updated to use pnpm.
59-59: LGTM!
The database seeding command has been correctly updated to use pnpm.
67-67: LGTM!
The development server command has been correctly updated to use pnpm's shorter command form.
pkspyder007
had a problem deploying
to
production
GitHub Actions
Failure
pkspyder007
had a problem deploying
to
production
GitHub Actions
Failure
pkspyder007
temporarily deployed
to
production
GitHub Actions
Inactive
|
Going to take this for a spin tonight. Excited to try pnpm its my first time |
|
Wow wild how seamless this change was! Literally just swapped out pnpm for npm for what I already use. 
Everything seems to be working. My only concern (and perhaps its not even valid) is this is another step that new contributors will need to do (Installing pnpm). Npm as you know comes bundled with Node so its just one less thing to think about. Overall I hope this gets approved. |
|
Uh oh! @JohnAllenTech, the image you shared is missing helpful alt text. Check #1188 (comment). Alt text is an invisible description that helps screen readers describe images to blind or low-vision users. If you are using markdown to display images, add your alt text inside the brackets of the markdown image. Learn more about alt text at Basic writing and formatting syntax: images on GitHub Docs. |
1 similar comment
|
Uh oh! @JohnAllenTech, the image you shared is missing helpful alt text. Check #1188 (comment). Alt text is an invisible description that helps screen readers describe images to blind or low-vision users. If you are using markdown to display images, add your alt text inside the brackets of the markdown image. Learn more about alt text at Basic writing and formatting syntax: images on GitHub Docs. |
CarolinaCobo
temporarily deployed
to
production
GitHub Actions
Inactive
✨ Codu Pull Request 💻
Fixes #(issue)
Pull Request details
Any Breaking changes
Associated Screenshots
[Optional] What gif best describes this PR or how it makes you feel