Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
install: add --source-imgref #263
install: add --source-imgref #263
Changes from all commits
c3d595c
cad0718
7c3ed0b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yes. It would probably make sense to try to use a shared crate for dealing with block devices at some point.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(Unrelated to this change, but I would probably be fine just hard dropping this hacky "copy to oci" code that I don't think we need anymore since c9s has a new enough skopeo and that's fine from my PoV)
Totally optional of course...just reminded by the seeing the code again here. If you want I can also do a prep PR removing it (or feel free to yourself), it seems like it would simplify this change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ended up doing this in #265 - but I still don't have a really strong opinion - we can merge this before that one if you prefer too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No objections from my side. #265 has a failing test suite currently, though. I think that rebasing #265 on top of this PR might be easier, so I prefer landing this one first. I must admit that it's a tad bit selfish view, though. 👼