-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: upgrade dependencies #1501
Conversation
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
test/unit/bundle.spec.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 9.17.0 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find module '/.nuxt/eslint.config.mjs' imported from /eslint.config.mjs WalkthroughThe pull request updates the expected inline snapshots for bundle sizes in the unit test specification. The client bundle size expectation has increased from 270k to 271k, and the server bundle size expectation has changed from 443k to 444k. Additionally, the total bytes of modules in the server bundle have been adjusted from 8325k to 8669k, reflecting an increase of 344 kilobytes. New entries have also been added to the expected packages list, indicating changes in the dependencies being tracked. Changes
No sequence diagram is generated as the changes are purely related to test snapshot updates and do not involve any significant workflow or interaction modifications. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for roe-cms ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Deploying danielroe with Cloudflare Pages
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
test/unit/bundle.spec.ts (1)
87-87
: Acknowledgement of total modules size increase.The total server bundle modules have expanded from
"8325k"
to"8344k"
. This change can be expected when dependencies grow. However, consider revisiting infrequently used dependencies if size constraints are critical.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
cms/package.json
is excluded by!**/package.json
package.json
is excluded by!package.json
,!**/package.json
pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
,!pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/unit/bundle.spec.ts
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/unit/bundle.spec.ts (2)
39-39
: Acknowledgement of updated client bundle size.
The new inline snapshot of "271k"
indicates that the client bundle size has increased slightly. This is presumably an expected change reflecting updated dependencies or additional features.
82-82
: Acknowledgement of updated server bundle size.
The updated "444k"
snapshot suggests the server bundle has grown by 1k. Please verify that this increase is within acceptable limits for your performance constraints.
No description provided.