-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 230
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
compiler: Fix dtype of FFP and edit sympy_dtype #2513
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
dtypes.add(i.dtype) | ||
except AttributeError: | ||
pass | ||
for i in expr.args: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will not work for nested expression, why does the previous one not work?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It passes all tests I believe (ofc without the ascent import issue).. so I'm not sure what kind of expression you are referring to? Will the nested expression not have a dtype attribute? Maybe I need singledispatch?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Searching through expr.free_symbols
for types like FieldFromPointer
is problematic because it examines the dtype of the pointer itself rather than the dtype of the field.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
then you may need to use singledispatch
to implement sympy_dtype
(which, btw, I'd rename into something else as "dtype" isn't even a SymPy thing; like, extract_dtype
or something like that)
An alternative would be to turn it into a recursive function (check expr; if not enough, check its arguments and for each argument call the function recursively), but it might not be enough for special objects like FieldFromPointer
@@ -292,7 +303,7 @@ def test_extended_sympy_arithmetic(): | |||
# noncommutative | |||
o = Object(name='o', dtype=c_void_p) | |||
bar = FieldFromPointer('bar', o) | |||
assert ccode(-1 + bar) == '-1 + o->bar' | |||
assert ccode(-1 + bar) == 'o->bar - 1' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why the order change?
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2513 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 87.28% 78.50% -8.79%
==========================================
Files 238 238
Lines 45703 45712 +9
Branches 4057 4058 +1
==========================================
- Hits 39892 35885 -4007
- Misses 5126 9078 +3952
- Partials 685 749 +64 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
No description provided.