Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency @babel/eslint-parser to v7.26.5 - autoclosed #6657

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 11, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@babel/eslint-parser (source) 7.25.9 -> 7.26.5 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

babel/babel (@​babel/eslint-parser)

v7.26.5

Compare Source

👓 Spec Compliance
🐛 Bug Fix
🔬 Output optimization

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled because a matching PR was automerged previously.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot added the renovate label Jan 11, 2025
@pmattmann pmattmann added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 11, 2025
Merged via the queue into devel with commit 393be04 Jan 11, 2025
61 of 63 checks passed
@pmattmann pmattmann deleted the renovate/babel-monorepo branch January 11, 2025 22:25
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency @babel/eslint-parser to v7.26.5 chore(deps): update dependency @babel/eslint-parser to v7.26.5 - autoclosed Jan 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants