-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ethclient/ethclient.go add_get_block_by_tag_function #30984
Open
EdisonSR
wants to merge
2
commits into
ethereum:master
Choose a base branch
from
EdisonSR:add_get_block_by_tag_function
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can retrieve the block by using tag with
BlockByNumber
endpoint.e.g.
However, I do see the point for having an endpoint to explicitly request blocks with tag.
While these special negative numbers can be translated by ethclient to tags, they are Geth-related, not publicly defined in the spec. Probably it's better to extend the BlockByNumber endpoint a bit, allowing specify tag explicitly?
cc @fjl
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your reply.,Yes, I can know which numbers represent which labels after digging into the code, but it is very inconvenient, so do I need to modify the BlockByNumber method and submit it again?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree the numbers are not very visible right now. After some discussion in team, we don't want to add another method, but would be open to improving documentation. We could also add redefinitions of these constants into package ethclient for convenience.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your reply.In response to your request, I have removed the method of querying according to tag , and in the BlockByNumber method, I have detailed instructions on how to obtain the corresponding blocknumber through tags. Please have a look, I hope this is a good PR , you can see the new commit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@fjl