Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Hillshade layer to notebook api #304

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gjmooney
Copy link
Collaborator

@gjmooney gjmooney commented Jan 10, 2025

Description

Add add_hillshade_layer to notebook api and removes some old MapLibre stuff from the RasterDemSource schema.

Checklist

  • PR has a descriptive title and content.
  • PR has one of the labels: documentation, bug, enhancement, feature, maintenance
  • Checks are passing.
    Failing lint checks can be resolved with:
    • pre-commit run --all-files
    • jlpm run lint

📚 Documentation preview: https://jupytergis--304.org.readthedocs.build/en/304/
💡 JupyterLite preview is available from the doc, by clicking on lite badge

Copy link
Contributor

Binder 👈 Launch a Binder on branch gjmooney/jupytergis/change_tests

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Integration tests report: appsharing.space

@gjmooney gjmooney changed the title [WIP] Change tests Add Hillshade layer to notebook api Jan 10, 2025
@gjmooney gjmooney added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 10, 2025
"attribution": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The attribution for the raster-dem source"
},
"encoding": {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it some outdated thing we used to have with maplibre?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, that and tileSize were needed in MapLibre

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants