Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump uraimo/run-on-arch-action to v2.8.1 #144

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

jhrcek
Copy link
Collaborator

@jhrcek jhrcek commented Dec 17, 2024

I'm trying to figure out why aarch64-9.10.1-bullseye and aarch64-9.6.6-bullseye suddenly started failing with errors like
(see https://github.com/haskell/docker-haskell/actions/runs/12351288511/job/34480433633?pr=143)

  #2 [internal] load metadata for docker.io/arm64v8/debian:bullseye
  #2 ERROR: no match for platform in manifest: not found
  ------
   > [internal] load metadata for docker.io/arm64v8/debian:bullseye:
  ------
  Dockerfile.aarch64.bullseye:1
  --------------------
     1 | >>> FROM arm64v8/debian:bullseye
     2 |     
     3 |     COPY ./run-on-arch-install.sh /root/run-on-arch-install.sh
  --------------------
  ERROR: failed to solve: arm64v8/debian:bullseye: failed to resolve source metadata for docker.io/arm64v8/debian:bullseye: no match for platform in manifest: not found
  Error: The process '/home/runner/work/_actions/uraimo/run-on-arch-action/v2.7.2/src/run-on-arch.sh' failed with exit code 1

I think it could have something to do with what's being fixed in https://github.com/uraimo/run-on-arch-action/releases/tag/v2.8.0 .. let's try.

@jhrcek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jhrcek commented Dec 17, 2024

Indeed, the version bumped resolved the aarch64 build issue.
@develop7 could you please check/approve?

Copy link
Collaborator

@develop7 develop7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM thank you for the heads-up!

@develop7 develop7 merged commit 62d579a into master Dec 17, 2024
24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants