-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump okhttp-api from 4.10.0-125.v3593b_a_f8c97b_ to 4.10.0-127.vf711b_27a_f7fe in /bom-weekly #1851
Merged
MarkEWaite
merged 8 commits into
master
from
dependabot/maven/bom-weekly/io.jenkins.plugins-okhttp-api-4.10.0-127.vf711b_27a_f7fe
Mar 18, 2023
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5131dff
Bump okhttp-api in /bom-weekly
dependabot[bot] 480fbef
Add org.jetbrains.annotations to sample plugin dep mgmt
MarkEWaite 94d84c3
Can at least remove `kotlin-bom` now
jglick df80362
Better to use `exclusions` rather than pin a version
jglick bed3b15
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/jenkinsci/bom into depend…
jglick 75a0e04
Merge branch 'master' into dependabot/maven/bom-weekly/io.jenkins.plu…
jglick 62a8f37
Merge branch 'master' into dependabot/maven/bom-weekly/io.jenkins.plu…
MarkEWaite 70d59fa
Merge branch 'master' into dependabot/maven/bom-weekly/io.jenkins.plu…
MarkEWaite File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jtnord @MarkEWaite I thought the point of this update was to remove all of these overrides?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the kotlin override above (line 30) should now be removed - alas the annotation is real conflict as it is bundled in multiple (two) plugins (config as code and okhttp) and at a lower version on config-as-code.
Given the dependencies are listed alphabetically maven sees the dependency from c-as-c first and then gives you the lower bound.
I had thought about introducing a kotlin dependency - but a quick look seemed to show only okhttp requiring it, and introducing it just for a class retention annotation seemed like overkill.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
jenkinsci/okhttp-api-plugin#142. Yet when they are removed:
org.jetbrains:annotations
should I guess be excluded as a dep from bothokhttp-api
andconfiguration-as-code
.org.json:json
seems like an actual conflict (missing library plugin) betweenconfiguration-as-code
,slack
, andjackson2-api
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Last time I did that it broke config as code as it could no longer tell what was optional vs required by reading the various nullability annotations.
Granted this appears to be the test harness and flexmark which is just a markdown parser....
As it was an older version of an annotation I was concerned that the annotation could have changed in an incompatible way that would somehow break classloading. (I know it is fine if missing - unless the annotation has RUNTIME retention - but was not sure if the annotation was present yet incompatible how things would fall out)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well the annotation dep could certainly be excluded from
okhttp-api
, right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what could possibly go wrong right :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
jenkinsci/okhttp-api-plugin#144