-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(FR-372): support id based object resolution #3040
Conversation
How to use the Graphite Merge QueueAdd either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:
You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. An organization admin has required the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository. Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue. This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
Coverage report for
|
St.❔ |
Category | Percentage | Covered / Total |
---|---|---|---|
🔴 | Statements | 4.93% | 398/8072 |
🔴 | Branches | 4.27% | 239/5601 |
🔴 | Functions | 2.95% | 78/2640 |
🔴 | Lines | 4.85% | 383/7897 |
Test suite run success
124 tests passing in 14 suites.
Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 85cae43
Merge activity
|
2463346
to
ce97896
Compare
ce97896
to
8cda7c0
Compare
8cda7c0
to
433194e
Compare
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
433194e
to
19f49e7
Compare
19f49e7
to
1eb8d27
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
d708bec
to
ab1bf24
Compare
ab1bf24
to
be1b7af
Compare
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
be1b7af
to
13c06f7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
13c06f7
to
83395f4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
resolves #3039 (FR-372) related PR: lablup/backend.ai#3451 Adds support for vfolder ID-based operations in the backend client and updates related components to handle both name-based and ID-based folder operations. This change enables more reliable folder management by using unique IDs instead of potentially ambiguous folder names. **Changes:** - Introduces `vfolder-id-based` feature flag for manager versions 25.1.0, 24.09.5, and 24.03.11 - Updates folder operations (clone, rename, share, info) to use folder IDs when supported - Modifies file operations within folders to use the appropriate identifier - Updates UI components to handle both ID and name-based operations seamlessly **How to check:** 1. checkout core branch. refer: lablup/backend.ai#3451 2. check [BA-518](https://lablup.atlassian.net/browse/BA-518) in webui part. 3. modify manager compatible versions in esm file for testing **Checklist:** - [ ] Documentation - [x] Minimum required manager version: 24.03.12, 24.09.6, or 25.1.0 - [ ] Test case(s) to demonstrate the difference of before/after [BA-518]: https://lablup.atlassian.net/browse/BA-518?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ
83395f4
to
85cae43
Compare
resolves #3039 (FR-372)
related PR: lablup/backend.ai#3451
Adds support for vfolder ID-based operations in the backend client and updates related components to handle both name-based and ID-based folder operations. This change enables more reliable folder management by using unique IDs instead of potentially ambiguous folder names.
Changes:
vfolder-id-based
feature flag for manager versions 25.1.0, 24.09.5, and 24.03.11How to check:
Checklist: