Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Fix for 12 vulnerabilities #198

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ghiggi
Copy link
Collaborator

@ghiggi ghiggi commented Nov 8, 2023

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `pip` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • docs/requirements.txt
⚠️ Warning
virtualenv 20.24.6 has requirement importlib-metadata>=6.6; python_version < "3.8", but you have importlib-metadata 5.1.0.
Sphinx 5.1.1 has requirement docutils<0.20,>=0.14, but you have docutils 0.20.1.
pyarrow 9.0.0 requires numpy, which is not installed.
notebook 6.5.6 has requirement pyzmq<25,>=17, but you have pyzmq 25.1.1.
netCDF4 1.6.2 requires numpy, which is not installed.
cftime 1.6.1 requires numpy, which is not installed.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

By pinning:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Upgrade Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 531/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 4.2
Remote Code Execution (RCE)
SNYK-PYTHON-IPYTHON-3318382
ipython:
7.34.0 -> 8.10.0
No Proof of Concept
medium severity /1000
Why?
Access Control Bypass
SNYK-PYTHON-JUPYTERSERVER-5862881
jupyter-server:
1.24.0 -> 2.7.2
No No Known Exploit
medium severity /1000
Why?
Open Redirect
SNYK-PYTHON-JUPYTERSERVER-5862882
jupyter-server:
1.24.0 -> 2.7.2
No No Known Exploit
low severity /1000
Why?
NULL Pointer Dereference
SNYK-PYTHON-NUMPY-2321964
numpy:
1.21.3 -> 1.22.2
No Proof of Concept
low severity /1000
Why?
Buffer Overflow
SNYK-PYTHON-NUMPY-2321966
numpy:
1.21.3 -> 1.22.2
No No Known Exploit
low severity /1000
Why?
Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-PYTHON-NUMPY-2321970
numpy:
1.21.3 -> 1.22.2
No Proof of Concept
medium severity /1000
Why?
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-PYTHON-PYDANTIC-5907722
pydantic:
1.10.4 -> 1.10.13
No Proof of Concept
medium severity /1000
Why?
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-PYTHON-PYDANTIC-5926694
pydantic:
1.10.4 -> 1.10.13
No Proof of Concept
medium severity /1000
Why?
Information Exposure
SNYK-PYTHON-REQUESTS-5595532
requests:
2.28.2 -> 2.31.0
No No Known Exploit
low severity 384/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 3.4
Open Redirect
SNYK-PYTHON-TORNADO-5537286
tornado:
6.2 -> 6.3.3
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 494/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.6
HTTP Request Smuggling
SNYK-PYTHON-TORNADO-5840803
tornado:
6.2 -> 6.3.3
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 611/1000
Why? Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5
HTTP Request Smuggling
SNYK-PYTHON-TORNADO-6041512
tornado:
6.2 -> 6.3.3
No No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Remote Code Execution (RCE)
🦉 Access Control Bypass
🦉 Open Redirect
🦉 More lessons are available in Snyk Learn

Copy link

@codescene-delta-analysis codescene-delta-analysis bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Health Quality Gates: OK

  • Declining Code Health: 0 findings(s) 🚩
  • Improving Code Health: 1 findings(s) ✅
  • Affected Hotspots: 1 files(s) 🔥

Recommended Review Level: Lightweight sanity check
View detailed results in CodeScene

✅ Improving Code Health:

  • Lines of Code in a Single File io.py 🔥

@ghiggi ghiggi closed this Dec 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants