-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NETOBSERV-2030: deploy on master nodes #143
Conversation
/ok-to-test |
New image: It will expire after two weeks. To use this build, update your commands using: USER=netobserv VERSION=64e36ce make commands |
/label qe-approved |
@jotak / @msherif1234 can I please get a quick review here as this is trivial change with huge impact ? |
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ spec: | |||
serviceAccountName: netobserv-cli | |||
hostNetwork: true | |||
dnsPolicy: ClusterFirstWithHostNet | |||
tolerations: | |||
- operator: Exists |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what does it mean to have just operator: Exists
without a key?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(btw, how does that work in the operator? I never realized we did anything special to have the agents on the master nodes, do we?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's exactly how it's done on the operator actually:
https://github.com/netobserv/network-observability-operator/blob/1aaeb6b3c0719c9ef73667daa3a04df0d69fd3ba/pkg/helper/flowcollector.go#L227
It's a trick to skip taints:
// Operator represents a key's relationship to the value.
// Valid operators are Exists and Equal. Defaults to Equal.
// Exists is equivalent to wildcard for value, so that a pod can
// tolerate all taints of a particular category.
// +optional
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I learned something, thanks! :-)
Wondering if we should make it an option? Like, if we start capturing pcap on master nodes, wouldn't be a higher risk to make the whole cluster unstable?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can use the --node-selector
option to filter out which node to target. I feel it's good enough.
#146 is adding a example with it
@jpinsonneau: This pull request references NETOBSERV-2030 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval. This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Description
Tolerations were missing to deploy on master nodes.
Dependencies
n/a
Checklist
If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.