Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: README updated #1396

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2024
Merged

chore: README updated #1396

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2024

Conversation

CodeWithEmad
Copy link
Member

@CodeWithEmad CodeWithEmad commented May 25, 2024

This will fix some issues in the readme:

  • code blocks added.
  • heading issues fixed.
  • small typos fixed.

Also in the readme said:

lease tag @edx/engage-squad on any PRs or issues.

I wanted to tag @edx/engage-squad but looks like this account is deleted. should I update that too?

@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label May 25, 2024
@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, @CodeWithEmad! Please note that it may take us up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

Feel free to add as much of the following information to the ticket as you can:

  • supporting documentation
  • Open edX discussion forum threads
  • timeline information ("this must be merged by XX date", and why that is)
  • partner information ("this is a course on edx.org")
  • any other information that can help Product understand the context for the PR

All technical communication about the code itself will be done via the GitHub pull request interface. As a reminder, our process documentation is here.

Please let us know once your PR is ready for our review and all tests are green.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.83%. Comparing base (e3ecee1) to head (b01a129).
Report is 6 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1396      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.76%   88.83%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         305      307       +2     
  Lines        5234     5268      +34     
  Branches     1327     1304      -23     
==========================================
+ Hits         4646     4680      +34     
  Misses        572      572              
  Partials       16       16              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@itsjeyd
Copy link

itsjeyd commented May 31, 2024

@CodeWithEmad Thank you for this contribution! We've got a green build so I'm marking it as ready for review now, but let me know if you had plans to work on it some more.

@itsjeyd
Copy link

itsjeyd commented May 31, 2024

Hey @openedx/2u-aurora team, this PR is ready for review.

@itsjeyd itsjeyd added waiting for eng review PR is ready for review. Review and merge it, or suggest changes. needs reviewer assigned PR needs to be (re-)assigned a new reviewer labels May 31, 2024
@CodeWithEmad
Copy link
Member Author

CodeWithEmad commented May 31, 2024

If @openedx/2u-aurora team maintains this repo, let me update the @edx/engage-squad mentioned in the readme.

@itsjeyd
Copy link

itsjeyd commented Jun 6, 2024

@CodeWithEmad Sounds good!

BTW, if a repo is maintained, it'll have the maintainer(s) listed as owner in its catalog-info.yaml file (example). So if you're ever unsure about the maintenance status of a repo you can just check that file.

@CodeWithEmad
Copy link
Member Author

Got it.

@itsjeyd itsjeyd requested a review from a team June 19, 2024 11:39
@itsjeyd
Copy link

itsjeyd commented Jun 19, 2024

Hi @openedx/2u-aurora team, could you have a look at this PR please?

@itsjeyd
Copy link

itsjeyd commented Jun 26, 2024

Reached out to core contributors via Slack.

Copy link
Contributor

@sarina sarina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, please address the point about catalog-info and we can get this merged.

README.rst Outdated

This is the Learning MFE (micro-frontend application), which renders all
learner-facing course pages (like the course outline, the progress page,
actual course content, etc).

Please tag **@edx/engage-squad** on any PRs or issues. Thanks.
Please tag **@openedx/2u-aurora** on any PRs or issues. Thanks.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's remove this line, or point at the https://github.com/openedx/frontend-app-learning/blob/master/catalog-info.yaml file. All repos are migrating to using catalog-info so let's not make it error prone by duplicating the info.

Copy link
Member Author

@CodeWithEmad CodeWithEmad Jun 28, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll remove it but I had PRs in the past stuck in review for months before I mentioned someone. Also, this pattern (mentioning the owner for review) is repeated in other repos like Profile MFE. What's the best solution here?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@CodeWithEmad It's completely fine to ping repo maintainers for review if they don't respond to a PR within a week or two.

I think @sarina's comment was more about not putting information about who owns a repo into two places. (Because it's easy to forget updating it in both places when it changes, especially when there's a widely accepted default for where this information should go.)

If you wanted to update the README of this repo to mention that PR authors should ping repo maintainers for review, you could still do that. Just keep it neutral -- i.e., instead of explicitly mentioning the current maintainer(s) in the README, tell the reader to check https://github.com/openedx/frontend-app-learning/blob/master/catalog-info.yaml to find out who to ping 🙂

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Exactly right, it's about duplicating information. I like @itsjeyd 's suggestion of pointing people to the catalog-info.yaml file.

@@ -1,25 +1,22 @@
#####################
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just FYI the overlines are not wrong, it's OK to leave them in. But OK that you've removed them.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I am aware of that. I am just trying to ensure all the documents have a consistent appearance.

README.rst Outdated

Example: https://support.edx.org/hc/en-us/articles/360000038428-Entering-math-expressions-in-assignments-or-the-calculator

SUPPORT_URL_ID_VERIFICATION
A link that explains how to verify your ID. Shown in contexts where you need
to verify yourself to earn a certificate. The example link below is probably too
edx.org-specific to use for your own site.
edx.org-specific to use for your site.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like this sentence better without this change, but will not block merging on this feedback.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have no objections to it. I'll revert the change.

@itsjeyd itsjeyd added waiting on author PR author needs to resolve review requests, answer questions, fix tests, etc. and removed waiting for eng review PR is ready for review. Review and merge it, or suggest changes. needs reviewer assigned PR needs to be (re-)assigned a new reviewer labels Jun 27, 2024
- code blocks added.
- heading issues fixed.
- small typos fixed.
@sarina sarina merged commit c7a81fe into openedx:master Jun 28, 2024
7 checks passed
@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

@CodeWithEmad 🎉 Your pull request was merged! Please take a moment to answer a two question survey so we can improve your experience in the future.

@CodeWithEmad CodeWithEmad deleted the chore/readme branch June 28, 2024 13:21
@itsjeyd itsjeyd removed the waiting on author PR author needs to resolve review requests, answer questions, fix tests, etc. label Jul 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants