Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: P4ADEV-510 storingUsers #35

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 25, 2024
Merged

feat: P4ADEV-510 storingUsers #35

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 25, 2024

Conversation

antonioT90
Copy link
Contributor

Description

List of Changes

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Pre-Deploy Test
    • Unit
    • Integration (Narrow)
  • Post-Deploy Test
    • Isolated Microservice
    • Broader Integration
    • Acceptance
    • Performance & Load

Types of changes

  • PATCH - Bug fix (backwards compatible bug fixes)
  • MINOR - New feature (add functionality in a backwards compatible manner)
  • MAJOR - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@antonioT90 antonioT90 requested review from LarissaASLeite and a team as code owners June 25, 2024 13:23
@sonarqubecloud SonarQubeCloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@antonioT90 antonioT90 merged commit 09a4dda into develop Jun 25, 2024
7 checks passed
@antonioT90 antonioT90 deleted the P4ADEV-510_storingUsersWhenLogin branch June 25, 2024 14:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@LarissaASLeite LarissaASLeite LarissaASLeite approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@antonioT90 @LarissaASLeite