Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: [TAE-357] high CVE in Tomcat #156

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

michele-fucito
Copy link
Collaborator

@michele-fucito michele-fucito commented Jan 15, 2025

Description

Updated spring-boot version from 3.3.5 to 3.4.1 to resolve the CVE.
Updated micriservice version from 1.1.6 to 1.1.7.

List of Changes

  • pom.xml

Motivation and Context

High CVE in Tomcat.

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Unit Test Suite
  • Integration Test Suite
  • Api Tests
  • Load Tests

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@michele-fucito michele-fucito requested a review from a team as a code owner January 15, 2025 10:37
@michele-fucito michele-fucito self-assigned this Jan 15, 2025
@michele-fucito michele-fucito changed the title [TAE-357-fix-CVE]: update spring fix: [TAE-357] Jan 15, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@TommasoLencioni TommasoLencioni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@michele-fucito microservice version bump, PR title and description are missing. Please add them.

@michele-fucito michele-fucito changed the title fix: [TAE-357] fix: [TAE-357] high CVE in Tomcat Jan 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants