Update proposal.md using pyquil quilt-demo branch changes #48
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The NONBLOCKING section could maybe be improved. It leads by saying that in some cases you may want to allow concurrent/simultaneous pulses on the same qubit and that this can be achieved with NONBLOCKING. But then finishes with saying that two consecutive NONBLOCKING PULSE 0 "xy" ... would require serial execution. It is mentioned between these two statements that the NONBLOCKING modifier does not exclude pulse operations on other frames but I think that should emphasised immediately and repeatedly
| |-----------|-----------------------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------| | ||
| | Frequency | INITIAL-FREQUENCY in DEFFRAME | Real numbers | Yes | | ||
| | Phase | 0.0 | Real numbers | Yes | | ||
| | Scale | 1.0 | Real numbers | Yes | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Frequency and Scale are now marked as Yes under Can be parameterized?. Are there examples of this in the proposal?
| ``` | ||
| # Simple capture of an IQ point | ||
| DECLARE iq REAL[2] | ||
| CAPTURE 0 "ro" flat(duration: 1e-6, iq: 2+3i) iq | ||
| CAPTURE 0 "ro" boxcar_kernel(duration: 1e-6) iq |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great question, esp as IIRC boxcar_kernel is not in fact supported yet in the translator?
| @@ -374,6 +364,19 @@ SET-SCALE 0 "cz" 0.45 | |||
| PULSE 0 1 "cz" erfsquare(duration: 100e-9, risetime: 20e-9, padleft: 0, padright: 0) | |||
| ``` | |||
|
|
|||
| Active Reset Calibration: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Was this intentionally removed from the proposal (in the pyquil version)? @kilimanjaro
| DELAY qubit 60e-9 | ||
| LABEL end | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ## FAQs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The FAQ was not present in the pyquil document. Was that intentional @kilimanjaro?
TODO:
Quil.g4