Feat(tokens): add helpers for fetching metadata #77
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 36bb9f1 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
|
Size Change: +4.3 kB (+18%) Total Size: 27.8 kB
ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
| * @returns {Promise<any>} The action parameters extracted from the quest data. | ||
| */ | ||
| export async function fetchQuestActionParams(uuid: string): Promise<any> { | ||
| const endpoint = `https://api.rabbithole.gg/v1.2/quest/public/${uuid}` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would add a TODO or open up an issue to update this endpoint to a Boost API in the near future
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Fetches the media URL from ERC1155 token metadata and performs basic validation or sanitization. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Don't think there's "basic validation or sanitization"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There's not - I'll change this comment we discussed using a service for this but I think we're just going to handle it with the dom purify in the front-end
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Might be worth purifying on the BE wherever we serve the info to prevent passing dangerous data to third party clients or w/e
| * @param {string} uuid The UUID of the quest. | ||
| * @returns {Promise<any>} The metadata of the ERC1155 token associated with the quest. | ||
| */ | ||
| export async function fetchERC1155MetadataByUUID( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[nit] Wonder if it makes sense to rename function to fetchERC1155MetadataByQuestUUID? I don't like the long variable name I suggested though lol
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like it, rather a more specific long name
| tokenId: number, | ||
| ): Promise<string | undefined> { | ||
| const metadata = await fetchERC721Metadata(client, contractAddress, tokenId) | ||
| // Here, you'd add logic to sanitize or validate the URL? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ahhh did we want to actually add validation / sanitization?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No I don't think so, was considering it but as mentioned above I think we handle this in the FE
|
Any updates on this @Quazia ? Going to need this for dynamic boost names |
|
@JamieLottering Just pushed the PR blocking this up for review but I'm going to re-open this PR into the other repo now that all this code has been ported over. Top priority is getting this upstream. Also are you going to need protocol specific dynamic name generation for Sound? If so I can export that from the plug-in, I'm guessing yes. |
yes, we need sound and mirror |
Adds helpers to get metadata given a contract address, or a UUID as well as a client wrapper that lets us pass in a single RPC and get back a client instance to perform calls against. We probably want to put these functions behind API routes.