-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Nexus transforms improvements #126
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e53857c
Expose GenericNeXusWorkflow in nexus module
SimonHeybrock 67c7c93
Rename PulseSelection -> TimeInterval
SimonHeybrock 49afdd8
Check earlier for bad time dependence
SimonHeybrock 6619f57
Rename function
SimonHeybrock 97d0ec5
Add mechanism for processing time-dependent transformation chains
SimonHeybrock cddfcdc
Remove dodgy and likely insufficient time-filter mechanism
SimonHeybrock dbc2b9c
Match input dim order and offset units
SimonHeybrock 70d9443
Remove tests written during feature development
SimonHeybrock 853544d
Bump scippnexus
SimonHeybrock 63a7d45
spelling
SimonHeybrock 0ce71d5
Explain choice of final bin size
SimonHeybrock File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why copy?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I felt there was little to lose, whereas we still run into some Scipp operations that do not handle non-contiguous data.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When I see
copy()
somewhere, my assumption is that it has some significance. E.g., that the result will be modified in-place. So I went looking but didn't find anything.Essentially, it increases 'noise' for the reader. But leave it or remove it, whichever you prefer.