roman_datamodels compatibility, move romandeps test to CI workflows

[bmorris3]

Description

Tests that rely on the optional Roman dependencies are currently failing since updates to roman_datamodels and rad that now save ramps as numpy arrays rather than astropy quantities. I've bumped the pin on rdm, and revised how units are handled for that data model in jdaviz. I've also moved the romandeps cron test into ci_workflows under allowed failures, so we'll have faster warning next time we're out of sync.

Change log entry

• Is a change log needed? If yes, is it added to CHANGES.rst? If you want to avoid merge conflicts,
  list the proposed change log here for review and add to CHANGES.rst before merge. If no, maintainer
  should add a no-changelog-entry-needed label.

Checklist for package maintainer(s)

This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainer(s) who will review this pull request of some common things to look for. This list is not exhaustive.

• Are two approvals required? Branch protection rule does not check for the second approval. If a second approval is not necessary, please apply the trivial label.
• Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals? Also manually run the affected example notebooks, if necessary.
• Do the proposed changes follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Did the CI pass? If not, are the failures related?
• Is a milestone set? Set this to bugfix milestone if this is a bug fix and needs to be released ASAP; otherwise, set this to the next major release milestone. Bugfix milestone also needs an accompanying backport label.
• After merge, any internal documentations need updating (e.g., JIRA, Innerspace)? 🐱

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 33.33333% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.78%. Comparing base (cf9664f) to head (e180621).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
jdaviz/configs/rampviz/plugins/parsers.py	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3353      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.80%   88.78%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         125      125              
  Lines       19155    19161       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        17010    17012       +2     
- Misses       2145     2149       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[pllim]

Thanks!

If your Roman test suite does not use remote data at all (e.g, CRDS or MAST or Box), please remove toxposargs: --remote-data. Otherwise, feel free to merge.

[lumberbot-app]

Owee, I'm MrMeeseeks, Look at me.

There seem to be a conflict, please backport manually. Here are approximate instructions:

1. Checkout backport branch and update it.

git checkout v4.0.x
git pull

2. Cherry pick the first parent branch of the this PR on top of the older branch:

git cherry-pick -x -m1 05e9afb0fdc11d062e52b483b11ee5ac1e8577ec

3. You will likely have some merge/cherry-pick conflict here, fix them and commit:

git commit -am 'Backport PR #3353: roman_datamodels compatibility, move `romandeps` test to CI workflows'

4. Push to a named branch:

git push YOURFORK v4.0.x:auto-backport-of-pr-3353-on-v4.0.x

5. Create a PR against branch v4.0.x, I would have named this PR:

"Backport PR #3353 on branch v4.0.x (roman_datamodels compatibility, move romandeps test to CI workflows)"

And apply the correct labels and milestones.

Congratulations — you did some good work! Hopefully your backport PR will be tested by the continuous integration and merged soon!

Remember to remove the Still Needs Manual Backport label once the PR gets merged.

If these instructions are inaccurate, feel free to suggest an improvement.

[pllim]

@bmorris3 are you able to do a manual backport? Thanks!