Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add benchmarks #85

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Dec 9, 2024
Merged

Add benchmarks #85

merged 17 commits into from
Dec 9, 2024

Conversation

kod-kristoff
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.00%. Comparing base (aa9c397) to head (3bb70a6).
Report is 17 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #85   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.00%   98.00%           
=======================================
  Files          14       14           
  Lines         301      301           
=======================================
  Hits          295      295           
  Misses          6        6           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchadd-benchmarks
Testbedci-ubuntu-latest-python-3.11

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds CLI flag.

Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencynanoseconds (ns)
benchmarks/test_load_json_file.py::test_load_from_file_json_iter_bm_large📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
377.86
benchmarks/test_load_json_file.py::test_load_from_file_json_iter_bm_medium📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
188.78
benchmarks/test_load_json_file.py::test_load_from_file_json_iter_bm_small📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
185.65
benchmarks/test_load_json_file.py::test_load_from_file_jsonl_iter_with_lib_json_large📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
240.38
benchmarks/test_load_json_file.py::test_load_from_file_jsonl_iter_with_lib_json_medium📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
182.67
benchmarks/test_load_json_file.py::test_load_from_file_jsonl_iter_with_lib_json_small📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
183.06
benchmarks/test_load_json_file.py::test_load_from_file_jsonl_iter_with_lib_orjson_large📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
233.50
benchmarks/test_load_json_file.py::test_load_from_file_jsonl_iter_with_lib_orjson_medium📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
187.66
benchmarks/test_load_json_file.py::test_load_from_file_jsonl_iter_with_lib_orjson_small📈 view plot
⚠️ NO THRESHOLD
187.24
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@kod-kristoff kod-kristoff added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 9, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 9e5c981 Dec 9, 2024
30 of 35 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant