Remove warnings post move to scala 2.11

[AnishShah]

No description provided.

[AnishShah]

Working on SynchronizedBuffer warning. Should I use java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue as the Deprecation warning says ?

[szymonm]

I think so.

On Sat Jan 24 2015 at 14:06:19 Anish Shah [email protected] wrote:

Working on SynchronizedBuffer warning. Should I use
java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue as the Deprecation warning
says ?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#130 (comment).

[AnishShah]

This removes all the warnings, except

[warn] There may be incompatibilities among your library dependencies.
[warn] Here are some of the libraries that were evicted:
[warn]  * com.google.guava:guava:13.0.1 -> 16.0.1
[warn] Run 'evicted' to see detailed eviction warnings

[pankajgupta]

Filed separate issue #132 for the library eviction warnings. Perhaps @caniszczyk or @travisbrown have seen that elsewhere as well?

[pankajgupta]

it is considered best practice to explicitly specify mutable.HashMap and import only scala.collection.mutable (see http://docs.scala-lang.org/overviews/collections/overview.html starting from "A useful convention is...")

[pankajgupta]

LGTM otherwise