-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Optimize Alternative
(part 4): add prependK
/appendK
specializations for Cats monad transformers
#4299
Open
satorg
wants to merge
7
commits into
typelevel:main
Choose a base branch
from
satorg:ne-alternative-specializations-montrans
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Optimize Alternative
(part 4): add prependK
/appendK
specializations for Cats monad transformers
#4299
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4855d29
add NeAlt-ve s12ns for monad transformers
satorg 0dbb511
rollback bin-compat hack
satorg 311619a
add Mima exclusions
satorg df8b184
make class name corresponding to file name
satorg 83a6472
fix compiler warnings
satorg 12d4feb
refactor tests for Alternative
satorg dfa64db
add tests for NonEmptyAlternative
satorg File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry if I missed it. Did we add law tests for this instance?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, no worries, here they are:
cats/laws/src/main/scala/cats/laws/NonEmptyAlternativeLaws.scala
Line 27 in f2d871c
cats/laws/src/main/scala/cats/laws/discipline/NonEmptyAlternativeTests.scala
Line 30 in f2d871c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I mean specifically for the
IndexedReaderWriterStateT
instance ofNonEmptyAlternative
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Accordingly,
AlternativeLaws
andAlternativeTests
were changed to extendNonEmptyAlternative*
:cats/laws/src/main/scala/cats/laws/AlternativeLaws.scala
Line 28 in f2d871c
cats/laws/src/main/scala/cats/laws/discipline/AlternativeTests.scala
Line 30 in f2d871c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@armanbilge is it what you're asking about?
cats/tests/shared/src/test/scala/cats/tests/IndexedReaderWriterStateTSuite.scala
Lines 451 to 466 in f2d871c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That part of tests was not changed, though, iirc – it included tests for NonEmptyAlternativeLaws automatically due to the inheritance.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, thanks. I was asking, because for the other instances you added tests using
ListWrapper.nonEmptyAlternative
in addition to existing tests using theListWrapper.alternative
, as far as I can tell.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I see... That's a fair concern.. And honestly, I don't remember why. There are three causes possible:
But I think, despite of the cause, it makes sense to return it back.