Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP #152

Open
wants to merge 43 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

WIP #152

wants to merge 43 commits into from

Conversation

juniperlsimonis
Copy link
Member

fix links on website

fix links on website
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #152 into master will decrease coverage by 2.71%.
The diff coverage is 5.40%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #152      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.71%   95.00%   -2.72%     
==========================================
  Files          11       12       +1     
  Lines        1223     1260      +37     
==========================================
+ Hits         1195     1197       +2     
- Misses         28       63      +35     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
R/meta_LDA_TS.R 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
R/LDA.R 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 06fde93...06fde93. Read the comment docs.

start back at square 1
patches to do with alpha testing issues
prevent dropping of dimension from data
making an Inf be -Inf
the weighted mlm fits didnt generate vcov matrices due to standard QR factorization
evaluation of construction based on alternative methods (likelihood max direct on the model; nnet approach translated to non-softmax) indicates that the v-cov is fine to be constructed by hand because the off block diagonals are functionally 0 due to the transformations imposed
this is an assumption that might not hold for all cases and might need to be addressed better in the future, but for now allows us to proceed on solid footing
updated to the current codebase
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant