Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci(feed): CIで画像のキャッシュを毎回更新する #205

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2024

Conversation

yamadashy
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 14, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on enhancing the GitHub Actions workflow configurations for CI and feed generation. The primary modifications involve implementing caching mechanisms for feed images across two workflow files: ci.yml and generate-feed.yml. The changes introduce more robust caching strategies for feed thumbnails and icons, utilizing the latest GitHub Actions cache actions and implementing a cache key based on the feed-info-list.ts file's hash. Additionally, simplifications were made in the naming of steps within the workflows.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci.yml Added caching steps for feed images using actions/cache/restore@v4 and actions/cache/save@v4
.github/workflows/generate-feed.yml Updated feed image caching logic, renamed "Cache feed images" step to "Restore feed images cache", added new "Save feed images cache" step, simplified step names
.github/workflows/external-test.yml Removed explicit name from the external tests step, simplifying the workflow definition

Possibly related PRs

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. This feature will be included in our Pro Plan when released.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fe53e77 and b31c1c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/external-test.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/generate-feed.yml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/external-test.yml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml
  • .github/workflows/generate-feed.yml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/generate-feed.yml (2)

37-46: Consider optimizing cache restore configuration.

The cache restore implementation looks good, but could benefit from some optimizations:

  1. Add compression for image caching:
 - name: Restore feed images cache
   uses: actions/cache/restore@v4
   with:
     path: |
       .cache
       public/images/feed-thumbnails
       public/images/feed-icons
     key: ${{ runner.os }}-feed-images-${{ hashFiles('src/resources/feed-info-list.ts') }}
     restore-keys: |
       ${{ runner.os }}-feed-images-
+    enableCrossOsArchive: true
+    compression-level: 6

53-60: Add cache monitoring.

The cache save implementation is correct, but adding monitoring would help track cache effectiveness:

 - name: Save feed images cache
   uses: actions/cache/save@v4
   with:
     path: |
       .cache
       public/images/feed-thumbnails
       public/images/feed-icons
     key: ${{ runner.os }}-feed-images-${{ hashFiles('src/resources/feed-info-list.ts') }}
+  id: cache-feed-images
+ - name: Check cache status
+   if: always()
+   run: |
+     echo "Cache hit: ${{ steps.cache-feed-images.outputs.cache-hit }}"
+     echo "Cache matched key: ${{ steps.cache-feed-images.outputs.cache-matched-key }}"
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)

102-111: Consider implementing a reusable workflow for caching logic.

The cache implementation is duplicated between workflows. Consider creating a reusable workflow:

  1. Create a new file .github/workflows/cache-feed-images.yml:
name: Cache Feed Images
on:
  workflow_call:
    outputs:
      cache-hit:
        description: "Whether there was a cache hit"
        value: ${{ jobs.cache-images.outputs.cache-hit }}

jobs:
  cache-images:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    outputs:
      cache-hit: ${{ steps.cache-feed-images.outputs.cache-hit }}
    steps:
      - name: Restore feed images cache
        id: cache-feed-images
        uses: actions/cache/restore@v4
        with:
          path: |
            .cache
            public/images/feed-thumbnails
            public/images/feed-icons
          key: ${{ runner.os }}-feed-images-${{ hashFiles('src/resources/feed-info-list.ts') }}
          restore-keys: |
            ${{ runner.os }}-feed-images-

Then use it in both workflows:

jobs:
  cache:
    uses: ./.github/workflows/cache-feed-images.yml

118-125: Optimize CI cache configuration.

The cache save configuration in CI could benefit from CI-specific optimizations:

 - name: Save feed images cache
   uses: actions/cache/save@v4
   with:
     path: |
       .cache
       public/images/feed-thumbnails
       public/images/feed-icons
     key: ${{ runner.os }}-feed-images-${{ hashFiles('src/resources/feed-info-list.ts') }}
+    enableCrossOsArchive: true
+    compression-level: 6
+  if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'

This ensures we only save cache in PR builds to avoid cache pollution from feature branches.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a05a859 and fe53e77.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/generate-feed.yml (1 hunks)

@yamadashy yamadashy merged commit 077685d into main Dec 14, 2024
10 checks passed
@yamadashy yamadashy deleted the feature/ci-cache branch December 14, 2024 13:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant