-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In from_source, recommend Xenial #5695
In from_source, recommend Xenial #5695
Conversation
+@RussTedrake for feature review, please. Review status: 0 of 7 files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved. Comments from Reviewable |
Reviewed 7 of 7 files at r1. drake/doc/from_binary.rst, line 18 at r1 (raw file):
BTW, three extra spaces. drake/doc/models.rst, line 4 at r1 (raw file):
BTW: @Lucy-tri FYI. Comments from Reviewable |
Reviewed 6 of 7 files at r1. drake/doc/from_binary.rst, line 14 at r1 (raw file):
BTW, thanks for updating this, too. drake/doc/ubuntu_trusty.rst, line 67 at r1 (raw file):
This is more painful than the other build instructions on this page. Can we not just summarize it with I personally know that when I'm installing a new machine (just did 4 ubuntu VMs on four different laptops this week), I just want to cut and paste the sudo's after I've verified for myself the first time. Comments from Reviewable |
btw, i did build the docs to verify locally. looks great apart from my one request below. Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 3 unresolved discussions. Comments from Reviewable |
also, can you recommend which is preferred: xenial vs trusty. Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 2 unresolved discussions. Comments from Reviewable |
Personally, I hope we drop Trusty before the year is out -- I think new users should be starting from Xenial. However, I didn't want to update the docs to dissuade people from Trusty until we get more consensus on #5012. If you agree that Xenial should at least be preferred, I'll update this PR with that also. Comments from Reviewable |
65318e1
to
8189bc9
Compare
I pushed some language preferring Xenial. Review status: 3 of 8 files reviewed at latest revision, 3 unresolved discussions. a discussion (no related file): drake/doc/from_binary.rst, line 18 at r1 (raw file): Previously, liangfok (Chien-Liang Fok) wrote…
Done. drake/doc/ubuntu_trusty.rst, line 67 at r1 (raw file): Previously, RussTedrake (Russ Tedrake) wrote…
Done. Comments from Reviewable |
8189bc9
to
31bd2ab
Compare
Review status: 3 of 8 files reviewed at latest revision, 2 unresolved discussions. a discussion (no related file): Previously, jwnimmer-tri (Jeremy Nimmer) wrote…
agreed. thanks. i think that if most of the developers are using xenial, then it makes sense to document that fact. Comments from Reviewable |
Reviewed 5 of 5 files at r2. Comments from Reviewable |
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion. Comments from Reviewable |
I will test this on Trusty and post results. |
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 2 unresolved discussions. drake/doc/ubuntu_trusty.rst, line 76 at r2 (raw file):
On my trusty machine, I have Bazel 0.4.4 installed:
These instructions are for Bazel 0.4.3. Is this correct? Comments from Reviewable |
drake/doc/ubuntu_trusty.rst, line 76 at r2 (raw file): Previously, liangfok (Chien-Liang Fok) wrote…
Yes, the instructions are for Bazel 0.4.3. Comments from Reviewable |
Reviewed 1 of 5 files at r2. drake/doc/from_source.rst, line 81 at r2 (raw file):
I guess this is not the entire story. We should add a note here saying that they might still have to use make or ninja if they want to build director. Comments from Reviewable |
31bd2ab
to
d2df567
Compare
Review status: 6 of 7 files reviewed at latest revision, 3 unresolved discussions. drake/doc/from_source.rst, line 81 at r2 (raw file): Previously, RussTedrake (Russ Tedrake) wrote…
Done. This discussion pointed out that we shouldn't be putting Bazel atop the list until #5621 is resolved. I've removed this one patch from this PR and set it aside for later. So for now, the only change to this file is to recommend Xenial. Comments from Reviewable |
Review status: 6 of 7 files reviewed at latest revision, 3 unresolved discussions. drake/doc/from_source.rst, line 81 at r2 (raw file): Previously, jwnimmer-tri (Jeremy Nimmer) wrote…
Sigh. OK. Comments from Reviewable |
Review status: 6 of 7 files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved. drake/doc/ubuntu_trusty.rst, line 76 at r2 (raw file): Previously, jwnimmer-tri (Jeremy Nimmer) wrote…
I confirm that the above recipe works on an Ubuntu Trusty machine. Below are some stats from my test-machine, which has 16 GB of RAM but an older Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3520M CPU @ 2.90GHz. It took 1.8 hours to build.
Comments from Reviewable |
Reviewed 1 of 2 files at r3. Comments from Reviewable |
... as well as other related tune-ups in preparation for recommending Bazel.
This change is