Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Player] Unified caching (1/X): Remove AVQueuePlayerWrapperLegacy implementation #174

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

asendra
Copy link
Collaborator

@asendra asendra commented Nov 28, 2024

Context

We want to migrate all GenericMediaPlayer implementations to the new unified caching layer.

This will allow us to enforce a LIFO with maximum storage size quotas between all of them, and the possibility to inform of the storage usage and the ability to clear the cache as requested.

Description

Now that we are exclusively using the new AVQueuePlayerWrapper implementation with the improved caching, we can get rid of the legacy one in preparation for the migrate to the unified cache layer.

@asendra asendra requested a review from a team as a code owner November 28, 2024 15:56
Base automatically changed from alberto/fix-player-output-sample-rate to main November 28, 2024 15:58
@asendra asendra force-pushed the alberto/remove-legacy-player-impl branch 2 times, most recently from c14cd75 to a81e746 Compare November 29, 2024 11:00
@asendra asendra changed the title [Player] Remove AVQueuePlayerWrapperLegacy implementation [Player] Unified caching (1/X): Remove AVQueuePlayerWrapperLegacy implementation Nov 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@ceciliasaraiva ceciliasaraiva left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice, so happy to get rid of all these legacy code 🙌

@asendra asendra force-pushed the alberto/remove-legacy-player-impl branch from a81e746 to c2e775d Compare December 4, 2024 16:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants